These are my personal tips and more on the observation side . Hence there are two group of people. one is the smart and the other is the smart player .that leaves to one empty spot need that needs to be filled by the looker. Since these two groups can't observe the looker. the smart play continues on, not on their behalf but on their fake behalf.it starts as if , how to get the looker angry ?
And by the time the two groups ended their plan .the plan is tied up with resistance by the looker out force inputs. So they end up wondering, when we make the looker less smart ? First these two groups of people who are the smart and smart player use very mysterious tactics that is highly unapproachable, such as ,once the looker for example applies for a benefit in a certain category. These two groups announce in public including media and marketing state sections all their tactics and decision to destroy the benefit rules who the looker applied for.then these two groups expect the looker not to be observant but blind and happy and smily after that.the reason behind that is the smart and smart player intelligence level has locked doors at the end.so the looker will just take a sigh and promote the stupidity level for these two groups to the public in an intelligence manner not a method as the other uses .since manners shape energy, manners shape mentality. all i can say you look less smart ,when you are thriving to get smarter.here is the key ! do not categorize.....? So what is the answer that's a simple IQ question, the answer is moves .another question will be, whoever falls the reason was ....? The answer is expectations of time. My third question is whoever gets to the final wait for ...?the answer is time relapse. My fourth question is who needs more gets .....? The answer is what is on sight. So the looker all he has to do is just answering their demands by his common sense. while the other two groups are sweating all time to gain all their sweat back to normal, and to redirect all their moving status to the break point.

No comments:
Post a Comment